Development of Hydrocarbon Gas Compressor With Integral Motor and Foil Bearing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Turbocompressors are important equipment in oil and gas industry. Despite advantages in size and efficiency, turbocompressors could not be widely applied for small capacity compressions due to high equipment cost and difficulties in high-speed rotor system design compared with reciprocating and screw compressors. By incorporating technologies developed from other disciplines of industry, simplified and efficient turbocompressor solutions have been derived, which may lower the capacity limit of centrifugal compressors and extend to traditional reciprocating compressor range. In addition, explosion protection technologies required for the hydrocarbon gas compressor design have been developed through studies and investigations on relevant industrial regulations. In this paper, hydrocarbon gas compressor design, tests, and applications are introduced. The compressors have been tested with several gases for oil and gas industry and refrigeration systems. Through tests with flammable hydrocarbon gases, soundness of foil bearing with high-speed integral motor and compliance in hazardous area applications have been demonstrated. Contrary to most traditional gas compressors, no gas is leaked to the atmosphere from the rotating shaft and coupling due to gas-tight design. The compressor can be used for natural gas compression, propane and natural gas liquefaction, and hydrocarbon base refrigeration systems, and it would contribute to the industry with less material and less polluting to the environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".