Évaluation de la modification du VO2 max après réalisation du programme PAPS 53
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objectif principal de notre étude était d’évaluer l’évolution de la capacité cardiorespiratoire après réalisation du programme Parcours d’Activité Physique et Santé 53 (PAPS 53). Nous avons également étudié l’évolution de la qualité de vie, de la performance physique et de l’adaptation physiologique à l’effort ainsi que de la masse corporelle et de la masse grasse. Il s’agit d’une étude prospective, monocentrique, quantitative, menée dans le service de médecine du sport du centre hospitalier de Laval (France) de mars 2022 à juin 2024. Nous avons comparé les mesures de VO 2 max et des principaux paramètres mesurés lors d’une épreuve d’effort avant et après 24 séances d’activités physiques adaptées étalées sur 12 semaines. Nous avons étudié l’évolution de la qualité de vie à l’aide du questionnaire MOS SF-36. Soixante-dix patients ont bénéficié des deux épreuves d’effort. L’âge moyen de notre population était de 54,5 ans pour une masse corporelle moyenne de 91,7 kg. La différence de VO 2 max sur les épreuves d’effort entre le début et la fin du programme était de +156 mL/min ( p < 0,001) soit 7,8 % d’augmentation moyenne. Il y avait également une augmentation de la puissance maximale aérobie de 9 Watts soit 7,5 % ( p < 0,001) et de la puissance au premier seuil ventilatoire (SV1) de 8 Watts soit 12 % ( p < 0,001). Il y avait une légère diminution de la masse corporelle et du périmètre abdominal ( p < 0,05). Il y avait une amélioration de la qualité de vie et une diminution des douleurs physiques ( p < 0,05). Le PAPS 53 permet une amélioration de la capacité aérobie et de la qualité de vie en seulement 2 séances par semaine pendant 12 semaines. Il nous semble essentiel de promouvoir l’activité physique adaptée et son offre sur le territoire pour améliorer la prise en charge des patients. The main objective of our study was to assess the evolution of cardiorespiratory capacity after completing the Physical Activity and Health Process 53 (PAPS 53) program. We also studied changes in quality of life, physical performance, physiological adaptation to exercise, as well as weight and fat mass. This is a prospective, single-center, quantitative study conducted in the sports medicine department of the Laval Hospital Center (France) from March 2022 to June 2024. We compared VO 2 max measurements, and the main parameters recorded during an exercise test before and after 24 sessions of adapted physical activities spread over 12 weeks. We also studied the evolution of quality of life using the MOS SF-36 questionnaire. Seventy patients completed both exercise tests. The average age of our population was 54.5 years, with an average weight of 91.7 kg. The difference in VO 2 max between the beginning and the end of the program was +156 mL/min ( P < 0.001), representing a 7.8% average increase. There was also an increase in maximal aerobic power of 9 Watts, or 7.5% ( P < 0.001), and in power at the first ventilatory threshold (VT1) of 8 Watts, or 12% ( P < 0.001). There was a slight reduction in weight and abdominal circumference ( P < 0.05), along with an improvement in quality of life and in physical pain symptoms ( P < 0.05). The PAPS 53 program leads to improvements in aerobic capacity and quality of life with just 2 sessions per week over 12 weeks. It seems essential to us to promote adapted physical exercise and continue to develop his availability in the territory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".