MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414135844 · doi:10.1016/j.addlet.2025.100323

From micro- to macro-cracks and recrystallization in a non-weldable Ni-based superalloy manufactured by electron beam powder bed fusion

2025· article· en· W4414135844 on OpenAlexafffund
Ehsan Toyserkani

Bibliographic record

VenueAdditive Manufacturing Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRecrystallization (geology)LiquationGrain boundarySuperalloyMicrostructureEutectic systemCrackingDislocation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the present study, CM247LC, a non-weldable Ni-base superalloy, was fabricated by electron beam powder bed fusion (EB-PBF) over a wide energy levels. For this purpose, variable process parameters were adjusted to investigate their effect on microstructure and crack formation. Samples fabricated at both low and high area energies exhibited pronounced crack susceptibility. At very low energy densities, lack of fusion (LoF) and porosities were observed, while higher energy densities produced denser samples. Adjustments to energy density and process parameters resulted in a grain structure transition from fine-columnar to coarse-columnar and near-single crystal morphologies. Despite these changes, the cracking issue persisted, with micro-cracks observed in low-energy samples and macro-scale cracks, several millimeters long, forming at higher energy densities, highlighting the material’s high sensitivity to crack formation. Both solidification and liquation cracking were identified— the former showing dendritic crack surfaces, and the latter associated with eutectic phases and grain boundary precipitates. Severe recrystallization around cracks was observed at high energy densities, characterized by elevated dislocation densities. EDS analysis revealed hafnium- and silicon-rich precipitates in interdendritic regions and near cracks, contributing to severe hot cracking in the material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdditive Manufacturing LettersSame topicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesFrench-language works237,207