MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414139428 · doi:10.30595/lks.v19i3.26744

Listening comprehension challenges and facilitating factors among Indonesian EFL students in English-speaking countries

2025· article· en· W4414139428 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Laksmy Ady Kusumoriny, Abdul Aziz

Bibliographic record

VenueLeksika Jurnal Bahasa Sastra dan Pengajarannya · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActive listeningIndonesianVocabularyForeign languageContext (archaeology)Qualitative researchLanguage proficiencyComprehensionGesture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Listening plays a crucial role in individuals’ communication with others and in their efforts to comprehend their surroundings. As one of the fundamental tools for learning, it serves as a foundation for the development of other language skills and is frequently employed both in everyday life and within educational contexts. Consequently, listening emerges as a key component in foreign language instruction. Learners’ ability to comprehend what they hear is essential to avoid difficulties in the language learning process. In the context of teaching English as a foreign language, the careful monitoring of learners’ listening processes and the identification of the challenges they face are vital for achieving instructional success. This study aims to identify the listening-related difficulties encountered by university students learning English as a foreign language at the Intermediate proficiency level. Grounded in a qualitative research approach, the study adopts a phenomenological design. The participants consisted of eight Indonesian students enrolled in English speaking countries such as US, Canada, Australia and UK. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews conducted with the selected participants. A descriptive analysis technique was employed to analyze the qualitative data. The participants reported several common difficulties during listening activities, including heavily accented speech, frequent use of idioms and proverbs, limited vocabulary knowledge, lack of attention to stress and intonation, and the speaker’s rapid speech rate. On the other hand, several facilitating factors were also identified. These included prior knowledge of other languages, having a rich vocabulary, engaging and interesting content, the presence of audiovisual elements, and the effective use of gestures and facial expressions by the speaker—all of which contributed to improved listening comprehension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLeksika Jurnal Bahasa Sastra dan Pengajarannya→Same topicEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning→French-language works237,207→