MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414141624 · doi:10.1088/2752-664x/ae04f0

Long-term expansion of satellite-measured beaver pond area after boreal forest fire

2025· article· en· W4414141624 on OpenAlexaffabout
Robert Fraser, M McFarlane-Winchester, Ian Olthof

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Research Ecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and biodiversity studies
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeaverCastor canadensisTaigaBorealShrubVegetation (pathology)Disturbance (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The engineering activities of beavers have a major influence on hydrology, vegetation, and biodiversity. The availability of preferred broadleaf vegetation forage is an important factor facilitating beaver colonization, and its subsequent depletion may result in the abandonment of beaver ponds. Previous studies have suggested that wildfires can lead to long-term increases in beaver populations by promoting the growth of early successional broadleaf vegetation. However, spatially explicit analyses demonstrating this relationship in the wildfire-modified boreal forest zone are lacking. In this study, we used Landsat satellite data for measuring changes in the extent of beaver ponds to provide an indicator of shifts in beaver activity and populations after fire. A sub-pixel mapping method was used to track annual surface water area in 3597 beaver pond complexes from 1985–2021 within a 4546 km 2 region of northwestern Ontario, Canada where wildfires burned 938 km 2 since 1985. We found that the surface water in 1390 beaver complexes adjacent to burns initially decreased after fire but then began to recover after 4 years. After 12 years, fire-impacted beaver ponds exceeded the area that would be expected based on changes in 2207 unimpacted beaver ponds that served as a control. Impacted ponds continued to expand and 34 years after fire had an extent that was 140% larger than control ponds. Annual land cover maps and forest inventory plots indicated that the cover of broadleaf shrub and tree forage adjacent to these expanding ponds was elevated above pre-fire levels for at least three decades following fire, while the cover of non-preferred needleleaf trees was substantially reduced. A similar, post-fire beaver pond expansion can be observed at other locations across Canada where broadleaf tree regeneration is present.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Research EcologySame topicEcology and biodiversity studiesFrench-language works237,207