Seasonal asynchrony and harvest diversification contribute to demersal finfish fisheries stability in Chesapeake Bay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biodiversity can confer temporal stability to ecosystem processes through asynchrony in species' abundances and may promote asynchrony and stability of commercial fishing harvests derived from exploited species. However, the linkages between asynchrony in the population dynamics of commercially harvested species and asynchrony of associated harvests have been difficult to resolve due to ecological, social, and economic dynamics that mediate resource extraction. Here, we explored coupled human-ecological relationships and emergent asynchrony using commercial fishing harvest data and fisheries-independent trawl surveys in two regions (Maryland and Virginia) of Chesapeake Bay, USA, from 2002 to 2018. For each region, we sought to identify how seasonal (within-year) asynchrony among harvested fish species contributed to (1) seasonal asynchrony in the harvests of these species and (2) within-year stability and economic value of harvests. We found that, in Maryland, seasonal closure of striped bass (Morone saxatilis) fishing resulted in asynchrony by forcing switching to alternative stocks. In Virginia, seasonal migration of harvested species to and from the Chesapeake Bay promoted harvest compensation and therefore harvest asynchrony. However, this effect was negated by the concurrent effects of an increase in the evenness of species dynamics on harvest compensation, reflecting changes in fishing patterns, primarily following declines in the biomass of Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulatus). Our findings show that both social (direct management actions and behavioral responses) and emergent properties of ecological systems can influence asynchrony in dynamics of exploited populations and commercial harvests, with implications for their continued management and sustainability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".