Characterization of particulate phosphorus forms and bioavailability in wastewater effluent to benchmark drivers of eutrophication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) discharges are a primary anthropogenic source of particulate and dissolved phosphorus that can contribute to nutrient spiralling and eutrophication, threatening downstream aquatic ecosystem health and drinking water treatability. Because fine solids are the primary vector for phosphorus transport in aquatic systems, this study departs from typical analyses of total phosphorus in WWTP discharges by providing new insights regarding the relative bioavailability of particulate phosphorus (PP) forms within them. A continuous-flow centrifuge (CFC)-based method was adapted for suspended solids collection from secondary (2°) and tertiary (3°) effluents at two WWTPs. These solids were then analyzed using chemical sequential extraction to quantify key PP forms to inform bioavailability. Non-apatite inorganic phosphorus (NAIP)-the most readily bioavailable phosphorus form-was the predominant PP fraction (typically >90 %) composing the wastewater effluent solids. It was predominantly bound to metal oxides. Benchmarking indicated that wastewater effluent solids can contain 10 to 100 times more NAIP than other commonly reported sources of PP, such as aquatic sediments from landscapes with varying levels of disturbance. Their impacts on receiving water quality are case-specific, depending on the relative magnitude and timing of NAIP loading from these and other sources. Although the relative composition of PP did not substantially differ between effluents from 2° and 3° treatment, NAIP concentrations in effluents from 3° treatment by cloth filtration were approximately 50 % lower than those in effluents from 2° treatment. These first-of-their-kind (1) application of a CFC to collect WW solids and (2) characterization PP forms and their bioavailability in WWTP effluents provide essential insight for understanding and modeling effluent-streamwater P dynamics and support targeted watershed management during sensitive environmental conditions (e.g., low flows) when receiving waters are most vulnerable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".