MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414154811 · doi:10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100821

A Modified Posterior Approach to the Nerve Transfer of the Spinal Accessory Nerve to the Suprascapular Nerve

2025· article· en· W4414154811 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lenny L Rivera-Rosario, Ruben Tresgallo Parés, José I Acosta Julbe, Alexandra Claudio Marcano, Joseph Salem-Hernández, G. Silvestrini, Norman Ramírez, Christian Foy-Parrilla

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hand Surgery Global Online · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNerve Injury and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccessory nerveSuprascapular nerveMagnetic resonance neurographySpinal nervePeripheral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Restoration of shoulder abduction and external rotation is critical in patients with upper brachial plexus injuries (BPIs). The transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve is a well-established surgical technique; however, the optimal approach remains debated. The traditional posterior approach may compromise muscle integrity because of trapezius detachment and splitting of the supraspinatus. This study introduces a muscle-sparing modification to the posterior approach and evaluates functional outcomes in pediatric and adult patients with obstetric or traumatic BPIs. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer using a muscle-sparing posterior approach from September 2018 to November 2022. Inclusion criteria comprised pediatric patients (aged ≤18 months) with obstetric BPIs and adult patients with traumatic BPIs with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 24 months. Pediatric patients were evaluated using the Toronto Muscle Grading System, Modified Mallet Grading System, and Birch Triple System. Adults were assessed using range of motion and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire scores. Results: Fourteen patients met the inclusion criteria (six pediatric and eight adult). Pediatric outcomes demonstrated Modified Mallet Grading System scores of grade IV and Birch Triple System stages IV-V, indicating good shoulder function. Toronto Muscle Grading System scores of 3 reflected active movement against gravity. Among adults, mean forward flexion improved from 35° to 53°, abduction improved from 28° to 47°, and external rotation improved from 12° to 23°. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire score improved from 91 to 48, exceeding the minimal clinically notable difference. No complications were observed. Conclusions: The muscle-sparing posterior approach for spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer is a safe and effective technique that yields favorable functional outcomes in both pediatric and adult BPI populations. Further comparative studies are warranted. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hand Surgery Global OnlineSame topicNerve Injury and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207