4 - Two-Year Efficacy and Safety of Rezūm Water Vapor Thermal Therapy in Large Prostates (≥80 mL)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While initial guidelines recommended Rezūm for prostates less than 80 mL, recent studies have demonstrated its efficacy and safety in larger prostates. Water Vapor Thermal Therapy (WVTT), Rezūm, is a minimally invasive therapy that uses water vapor to ablate benign prostatic tissue. This study aims to present the prospective, multi-center outcomes of the largest cohort of prostates ≥80 mL treated with Rezūm. This study involved a prospective, Rezum registry which collated information from two high-volume centers between April 2019 and August 2024. Baseline medical histories, uroflowmetry (Qmax, PVR), and validated questionnaires (IPSS, IPSS QoL, BPHII, IIEF-15, MSHQ-EjD) were recorded. The main outcomes assessed included symptom scores, functional improvement, and safety at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months. A total of 259 patients with a prostate volume ≥80 mL were treated with Rezūm. The median prostate volume was 105 mL (interquartile range 91–122.5 mL), with 207 patients (81.2%) exhibiting a median lobe. A history of urinary retention was noted in 86 patients (33.6%). On average, 13.2 injections (±3.8) were administered per procedure, which lasted an average of 6.9 minutes (±10.1). The IPSS improved from 21.8 (n=212) at baseline to 9.1 at 6 months (n=131), 6.6 at 12 months (n=107), and 5.7 at 24 months (n=68). At baseline, the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) was 8.2 mL/s (n=198), increasing to 14.6 mL/s at 6 months (n=45), 14.1 mL/s at 12 months (n=46), and 14.9 mL/s at 24 months (n=33). Post-void residual (PVR) volume at baseline was 132.5 mL (n=196), decreasing to 72 mL at 6 months (n=42), 60 mL at 12 months (n=93), and 90 mL at 24 months (n=38). The IPSS quality of life (IPSS QoL) score decreased from 4.5 (n=212) at baseline to 1.4 at 6 months (n=131), 1.65 at 12 months (n=107), and 1.1 at 24 months (n=68). The BPHII decreased from 7.5 at baseline (n=171) to 3.3 at 6 months (n=86), 2.9 at 12 months (n=65), and 2.3 at 24 months (n=35). There was no significant difference noted in sexual function as measured by IIEF and MSHQ. Rezūm water vapor therapy appears to be both effective and well-tolerated in men with significantly enlarged prostates (≥80 mL), including those with challenging anatomy such as a median lobe and those with a history of urinary retention. Symptom improvement was both rapid and sustained over time. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) improved from a baseline of 21.8 to 5.7 at 24 months. Maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) also improved significantly, rising from 8.2 mL/s at baseline to 14.9 mL/s at 24 months. Similarly, post-void residual volume (PVR) decreased from 132.5 mL at baseline to 90 mL at 24 months. Quality of life, as assessed by the IPSS QoL score, also improved dramatically The BPH Impact Index (BPHII) followed a similar trend, decreasing from 7.5 to 2.3 by 24 months. Importantly, sexual function was preserved, with no significant changes observed in IIEF or MSHQ scores. These findings suggest that Rezūm is a promising minimally invasive treatment option even for patients with large prostates and complex anatomy, offering durable symptom relief without compromising sexual health. Significant improvements were observed in urinary symptoms and quality of life, with minimal impact on sexual function. Funding no funding Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it