MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414164847 · doi:10.64730/jrdbantul.v21i4.64

Pengaruh Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Rata-rata Lama Sekolah terhadap Tingkat Pengangguran Terbuka di Kabupaten Bantul

2021· article· id· W4414164847 on OpenAlexaff
Dionysius Desembriarto

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Riset Daerah · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
Keywordsnot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pengangguran terbuka masih menjadi salah satu permasalahan di hampir semua negara sedang berkembang termasuk Indonesia umumnya dan Kabupaten Bantul di DIY pada khususnya.Permasalahan ketenagakerjaan tersebut memiliki dimensi sosial dan ekonomi serta bersifat multidimensi. Perkembangan tingkat pengangguran terbuka di Kabupaten Bantul dari tahun ke tahun menunjukkan fluktuasi yang berarti bahwa potensi permasalahan tingkat pengangguran terbuka masih dapat dialami di tahun-tahun mendatang. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis variabel yang berpengaruh terhadap tingkat pengangguran terbuka di Kabupaten Bantul. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang bersumber dari publikasi BPS Provinsi DIY dan BPS Kabupaten Bantul. Hasil penelitian dengan menggunakan model regresi menemukan bahwa pertumbuhan ekonomi berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap tingkat pengangguran terbuka sedangkan rata-rata lama sekolah tidak berpengaruh secara signifikan. Rekomendasi penelitian adalah peningkatan aktivitas perekonomian penting dalam mengurangi tingkat pengangguran. Kebijakan pembangunan ekonomi harus diarahkan pada perkembangan bisnis atau sektor swasta yang beroperasi dengan membutuhkan tenaga kerja yang berpendidikan relatif tinggi agar dapat menyerap lebih banyak tenaga kerja yang berpendidikan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Riset DaerahSame topicSMEs Development and Digital MarketingFrench-language works237,207