MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414164847 · doi:10.64730/jrdbantul.v21i4.64

Pengaruh Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Rata-rata Lama Sekolah terhadap Tingkat Pengangguran Terbuka di Kabupaten Bantul

2021· article· id· W4414164847 on OpenAlexaff
Dionysius Desembriarto

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Riset Daerah · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
Keywordsnot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pengangguran terbuka masih menjadi salah satu permasalahan di hampir semua negara sedang berkembang termasuk Indonesia umumnya dan Kabupaten Bantul di DIY pada khususnya.Permasalahan ketenagakerjaan tersebut memiliki dimensi sosial dan ekonomi serta bersifat multidimensi. Perkembangan tingkat pengangguran terbuka di Kabupaten Bantul dari tahun ke tahun menunjukkan fluktuasi yang berarti bahwa potensi permasalahan tingkat pengangguran terbuka masih dapat dialami di tahun-tahun mendatang. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis variabel yang berpengaruh terhadap tingkat pengangguran terbuka di Kabupaten Bantul. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang bersumber dari publikasi BPS Provinsi DIY dan BPS Kabupaten Bantul. Hasil penelitian dengan menggunakan model regresi menemukan bahwa pertumbuhan ekonomi berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap tingkat pengangguran terbuka sedangkan rata-rata lama sekolah tidak berpengaruh secara signifikan. Rekomendasi penelitian adalah peningkatan aktivitas perekonomian penting dalam mengurangi tingkat pengangguran. Kebijakan pembangunan ekonomi harus diarahkan pada perkembangan bisnis atau sektor swasta yang beroperasi dengan membutuhkan tenaga kerja yang berpendidikan relatif tinggi agar dapat menyerap lebih banyak tenaga kerja yang berpendidikan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Riset DaerahSame topicSMEs Development and Digital MarketingFrench-language works237,207