Jensen-Generalized Discrete Fisher Information, Its Generating Function, and Applications to Image Processing and Contaminated Models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, we first introduce a discrete version of generalized Fisher information measure and develop some new results for it. We then propose Jensen-generalized discrete Fisher (Jensen-GDF) information as a generalized measure, based on the convexity property of generalized discrete Fisher information measure. We further introduce generating functions for generalized discrete Fisher information and Jensen-GDF information measures and use them to develop some results. We also propose a new correlation coefficient in terms of the generalized discrete Fisher information and discuss some of its properties. Finally, to demonstrate the usefulness of the Jensen-generalized discrete Fisher information measure and the proposed correlation coefficient, we apply them to two real-world examples in image processing and forms of contaminated data, and present corresponding numerical results. Our findings show that the Jensen-GDF information measure and the correlation coefficient introduced here are effective criteria for quantifying similarity between two images in image processing settings and for analyzing contaminated data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it