MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414168571 · doi:10.1111/micc.70026

Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide: Another Player in Adipose Tissue Blood Flow Regulation?

2025· article· en· W4414168571 on OpenAlexafffund
Richard Sotorník, Julie Ménard, Pascal Brassard, Maude Gagnon‐Auger, Jean‐Patrice Baillargeon, Jean‐Luc Ardilouze

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocirculation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAdipose tissueVasodilationVasoactive intestinal peptideVasoactiveBlood flowWhite adipose tissue

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Objectives In healthy people, adipose tissue blood flow (ATBF) rises postprandially; however, in one third of them, this response is altered. These people are characterized by prolonged postprandial lipemia and higher cardiometabolic risk. Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) is a gut neurotransmitter with a vasodilatory effect. The aim of the study was to assess the role of VIP in ATBF regulation and its postprandial blunting. Methods Plasma VIP and ATBF ( 133 Xenon washout technique) were measured during a 75 g oral glucose load in 16 healthy participants. ATBF was monitored in 12 individuals during in situ microinfusion of incremental doses of VIP (10 −7 , 10 −6 , 10 −5 mol L −1 ). Results Oral glucose induced no change in plasma VIP. Post‐glucose ATBF measures identified 7 non‐responders (peak blood flow < 50% of fasting values) and 9 responders. Compared to baseline (2.50 [1.96–3.59] mL·100 g −1 min −1 ), local microinfusion of VIP increased ATBF dose‐dependently: 2.67 [2.18–3.89]; 4.35 [3.33–4.65]; and 7.91 [6.59–9.88] mL·100 g −1 min −1 ( p < 0.0001) with a non‐significant lower response to VIP in non‐responders. Conclusions Our findings show a potent vasodilatory effect of VIP in adipose tissue and suggest that individuals with a blunted ATBF response to glucose load have a lower response. Whether the local unresponsiveness to VIP participates in this non‐responder status has to be confirmed in larger studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocirculationSame topicNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207