Improvement of Spontaneous Locomotor Activity in a Murine Model of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy by N‐Acetylglucosamine Alone and in Combination With Prednisolone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) is an endogenous compound with intracellular concentration closely linked to the biosynthesis of acetyllactosamine-rich N-linked oligosaccharides. These oligosaccharides interact with mammalian lectin galectin-3, mediating cell surface receptor dynamics as well as cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interactions. Our previous and recent studies suggest that GlcNAc, in conjunction with galectin-3, enhances muscle regeneration in vitro. We have also demonstrated that intraperitoneal GlcNAc administration improves muscle strength in mdx mice, a murine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Here, we show that oral administration of GlcNAc significantly improves the spontaneous locomotor activity of mdx mice. Daily treatment with United States Pharmacopeia-grade GlcNAc at doses of 0.6, 1.2, 1.8, and 2.4 g/kg body weight for 35 days significantly enhanced nocturnal spontaneous locomotor activity, with the 1.2 g/kg body weight dose (equivalent to 0.144 g/kg body weight in humans) reducing damages of extensor digitorum longus muscle by nearly 50%. Although consecutive forced exercises, specifically horizontal and downhill treadmill running, reduced GlcNAc-mediated improvement, mice treated with 0.6 and 1.2 g/kg body weight still showed increased overall spontaneous locomotor activity under this condition, despite the lack of protection against repeated eccentric contraction-induced injury. These findings suggest that GlcNAc enhances overall muscle health, possibly through mechanisms other than direct protection from muscle injury. One possible contributing mechanism may involve enhanced muscle repair or regeneration, as suggested by our related in vitro myogenesis work. Notably, co-administration of GlcNAc with prednisolone, a corticosteroid commonly prescribed for DMD patients, further enhanced spontaneous locomotor improvement in mdx mice compared to prednisolone alone. These findings suggest that GlcNAc has the potential to improve the clinical status of DMD patients, either as a monotherapy or in combination with corticosteroids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".