Exploring the impact of early emotional abuse on eating disorder psychopathology: a multiple mediation analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Childhood emotional abuse (EA) is a well acknowledged risk factor promoting the association between any type of childhood maltreatment and eating disorder (ED) psychopathology. Objectives This study investigated the association between EA and ED specific symptoms exploring multiple potential mediators to better understand this complex relationship. Methods The study sample included 151 individuals with Anorexia Nervosa (AN), 115 with Bulimia Nervosa (BN), and 108 healthy participants. Before entering treatment programs, participants completed the following questionnaires: the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, the Behavioral Inhibition System/ Behavioral Approach System, BAS, and the Eating Disorder Inventory-2. A multiple mediation model was run including EA as independent variable, eating symptoms as dependent variables, and ineffectiveness, sensitivity to punishment, alexithymia, and impulsivity as mediators. Results In individuals with AN impulsivity emerged as mediator between EA and desire for thinness and bulimic behaviors. In those with BN sensitivity to punishment mediated the relationship between EA and dissatisfaction with body image. In both clinical groups ineffectiveness and difficulty identifying emotions were mediators of the relationship between EA and eating-related symptoms. No mediation effect was observed in healthy controls, although a total effect of EA on dissatisfaction with one’s body was observed. Conclusions Impulsivity, sensitivity to punishment, ineffectiveness, and alexithymia may make individuals with childhood EA more vulnerable to ED psychopathology with some differences between AN and BN. Addressing these psychological problems and their connections with early emotional abuse may represent treatment targets for individuals with EDs and a history of childhood trauma. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".