Thus far there are no statistically significant differences between various apolipoprotein E genotypes in the cluster of seven responsiveness to a flaxseed oil supplement in persons with type 2 diabetes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective. The objective of the present study was to determine if there would be statistically significant differences among apolipoprotein E genotypes in the responsiveness of members of a cluster of seven measures in persons with type 2 diabetes consuming a flaxseed oil supplement (FOS). The cluster of seven are: abdominal obesity, hypertension, platelet hyperaggregability, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia (decreased serum levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc) and increased serum levels of triglycerides), increased serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation (LDL conjugated dienes) and increased inflammation. All cluster members exacerbate type 2 diabetes. Methods. Thirty-two patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes participated in this double-blind, placebo (safflower oil supplementation (SOS))-controlled study consisting of three visits. Apolipoprotein E genotyping was done at visit one. The cluster of seven was assessed at each visit. Results. Only platelet aggregability decreased as the result of the FOS relative to placebo while it appeared that there might be some potential for FOS to decrease LDL conjugated dienes. No apolipoprotein E genotype affected any of the cluster of seven responsiveness. Conclusions. Identified apolipoprotein E genotypes played no role in the responsiveness of any member of the cluster of seven to FOS in this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".