<i>marApp</i> : An R package and web portal to calculate mutations- and genetic diversity-area relationship for conservation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract International conservation policies including the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework now consider genetic diversity of wild species in their targets. However, scalable, theory-driven tools to assess and predict genetic diversity loss are still emerging, limiting their use in conservation planning. Analogous to the species-area relationship, recent work has shown that genetic diversity scales with area, described by the mutations–area relationship (MAR) or genetic–diversity–area relationship (GDAR), can approximate the genetic diversity loss in a species from habitat reduction. To enable application of these insights for conservation practitioners and policy makers, we present the mar R package and marApp web portal, a fast and user-friendly tool for MAR/GDAR analysis. The mar package connects genetic diversity patterns in space to ecological theory, and automates steps from reading genetic and geographic data to simulating various habitat extinction scenarios using MAR/GDAR. The mar package estimates only short-term genetic diversity, providing a lower-limit for the far greater long-term genetic losses, underscoring the need to maximize present-day habitat conservation before it becomes irreversible. As a case example, we showcase predictions of coral ( Acropora sp.) genetic diversity loss from reef coverage impacts. We demonstrate the usage of marApp without requirements for prior genetics or coding experiences, and provide downloadable reports for conservation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.136 | 0.079 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".