Aloha from Vancouver: Celebrating a Modern Pacific Metropolis at the Vancouver Golden Jubilee of 1936
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1936, amid the Great Depression, the City of Vancouver marked the 50th anniversary of its incorporation. Organizers initially planned a modest observance, befitting the economic circumstances. However, the Golden Jubilee expanded into a lavish festival, largely because of the influence of the city’s eccentric, populist mayor, Gerald Grattan McGeer. McGeer recast the 50th birthday as a celebration of Vancouver’s connection to the Pacific Rim. Its most ambitious element was to be a series of exotic exhibits representing various Pacific cultures. With the help of Olympic swimmer and surfer Duke P. Kahanamoku, McGeer planned to erect a Hawaiian village in Stanley Park and offer demonstrations of traditional Polynesian clam-diving in the city’s outdoor swimming pools. More impressive was the Chinese village constructed for the jubilee, which included temporary buildings and demonstrations of cultural traditions and handicrafts. This article uses the Vancouver Golden Jubilee as a lens to explore the tensions that underpinned Vancouver’s Pacific context between the wars. As an American territory, Hawai’i was a “safe” Pacific partner to celebrate, but McGeer and Kahanamoku’s presentation of Hawaiian culture ignored the complicated history of “Kanaka” settlement in the Vancouver area. Meanwhile, the Chinese village relied on outside expertise and the mayor’s deft use of exemptions to the Chinese Immigration Act but served as an opportunity for quiet resistance to racist laws from the Chinese Canadian community. Finally, the Pacific focus suited McGeer’s own ambivalence about the rest of Canada: it cast Vancouver as the natural centre of a westward-facing British Columbia only incidentally linked to the eastern provinces. However, an imitative commemoration the following year for the 125th anniversary of the founding of Fort Kamloops showed that British Columbians outside Vancouver did not necessarily accept this metropolitan and cosmopolitan vision of their region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.043 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".