MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414199029 · doi:10.1109/cvprw67362.2025.00586

An End-To-End Pipeline for Virtual Banner Replacement in Football Broadcasts

2025· article· en· W4414199029 on OpenAlexaff
Victor Gaspar, Anthony Cioppa, Jan Held, Silvio Giancola, Marc Braham, Adrien Deliège, Bernard Ghanem, Marc Van Droogenbroeck

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Analysis and Summarization
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline (software)Augmented realityMonetizationFootballBroadcasting (networking)Key (lock)BannerVirtual reality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Augmented reality has been used in sports broadcasting since the 1990s to enhance viewer engagement through virtual overlays. A key application is virtual advertising, which replaces physical advertisement banners with dynamic digital content, enabling targeted and regionspecific advertisements. This technology optimizes advertising space and increases monetization opportunities for broadcasters. However, traditional augmented reality solutions require specialized hardware, such as instrumented cameras and virtual-ready LED panels, along with manual calibration and prior environmental knowledge. These constraints make its implementation costly and less adaptative. In this work, we propose a first fully automated end-to-end pipeline that seamlessly integrates augmented reality advertising into sports broadcasts using only the main camera feed. Our approach leverages state-of-the-art deep neural networks to identify the advertisement banner, estimate camera motion, and dynamically composite virtual content without additional hardware or manual intervention. We validate our pipeline on football broadcasts using our novel SoccerNet-banner dataset, the first dataset for training and evaluating banner segmentation models, and demonstrate high-quality virtual banner replacement on SoccerNet videos. Therefore, our pipeline unlocks new possibilities for personalized content and advances AI-powered sports broadcasting by eliminating hardware dependencies and manual calibration. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/SoccerNet/snbanner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Analysis and SummarizationFrench-language works237,207