MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414212145 · doi:10.53379/cjcd.2025.429

Refonte de la version québécoise de l’Échelle Entrepreneure de l'inventaire typologique de caractéristiques personnelles (EE-ITCP-72-R)

2025· article· fr· W4414212145 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Robert Alarie-Mercier, Marcos Alencar Abaíde Balbinotti

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Career Development · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPilotagePoison controlHuman Dimension

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Afin de faciliter l’évaluation de l’orientation professionnelle, John L. Holland a développé la théorie vocationnelle selon un modèle hexagonal postulant que la personnalité professionnelle et les environnements de travail se subdivisent selon six types distincts dans les sociétés occidentales. En plus de ses intérêts, la personnalité de l'individu, c'est-à-dire ses caractéristiques personnelles, contribue à une meilleure compréhension du choix vocationnel. L’objectif principal de cette étude porte sur la refonte la version québécoise de l’Échelle Entrepreneure de l'Inventaire Typologique de Caractéristiques Personnelles (EE-ITCP-72-R). Pour cette étude, 308 participants franco-québécois ont été recrutés. L'EE-ITCP-72-R comprend 12 caractéristiques personnelles. L’analyse factorielle exploratoire supporte également que l’Échelle Entrepreneure du modèle RIASEC de Holland n’est pas unidimensionnelle et qu'elle peut être sous-divisée en trois dimensions. Les indices de consistance interne de chaque dimension sont également adéquats. Pour conclure, étant basé sur la théorie vocationnelle de Holland, l'EE-ITCP-72-R permet de déterminer le profil vocationnel en lien avec la personnalité professionnelle de type Entrepreneure. De plus, la présence de dimensions permet de peaufiner le profil afin d’illustrer l'individualité du répondant avec davantage de précisions et de s'assurer de la plus grande adéquation avec le domaine d'emploi recherché.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.326
Threshold uncertainty score0.656

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Career DevelopmentSame topicEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207