MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414218037 · doi:10.36688/ewtec-2025-1092

Large Eddy Simulation of an Energetic Tidal Strait with Device-Scale Turbulence

2025· article· en· W4414218037 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaDalhousie UniversityAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTidal powerTurbulence modelingTurbulenceLarge eddy simulationAcoustic Doppler current profilerFlow (mathematics)Tidal ModelUnstructured gridComputational fluid dynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tidal channels suitable for tidal power devel- opments exhibit complex, turbulent flow, at high Reynolds numbers with dynamic features over a wide range of scales that can persist for several hours. Modelling such flow plays a key part in characterising the conditions that tidal turbines will experience in situ. However, simulations of these channels are extremely challenging, and many numerical models compromise on either fidelity or size to keep computational complexity down to a manageable scale. New numerical techniques are required to overcome these restrictions, and provide the tidal energy industry with valuable insights into the marine environment. This paper presents a non-hydrostatic, high-fidelity com- putational fluid dynamics model of the Grand Passage in the Bay of Fundy, Canada, using the coastal and tur- bine modelling software CoastED. The model employs a Discontinuous Galerkin finite element formulation of the Navier-Stokes momentum equation, coupled with a Vreman subgrid eddy viscosity model, a variant of Large Eddy Simulation adapted for anisotropic grids. This, along with the use of a novel unstructured grid scheme, allows flow features from centimetres to kilometres to be captured over several M2 tidal cycles. By comparing virtual Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) results data with measurements from real ADCPs in the Grand Passage, we show that the model is effective in recreating aspects of the tidal currents often missed in hydrostatic simulations. We also examine some of larger modelled tidal flow features, and contrast them with evi- dence from satellite data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.296
Threshold uncertainty score0.420

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it