MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414220638 · doi:10.1016/j.jaacop.2025.09.001

Cross-Cultural Consortium on Irritability (C3I): An International Network for Research on Cultural Similarities and Differences in Irritability

2025· article· en· W4414220638 on OpenAlexafffund
Wan‐Ling Tseng, Nellia Bellaert, Tami D. Benton, Melissa A. Brotman, Spencer C. Evans, John D. Herrington, Manish K. Jha, Jennifer E. Lansford, Julia Linke, Kalina J. Michalska, Reut Naim, Massimiliano Orri, Jamilah Silver, Argyris Stringaris, Luisa Sugaya, Pablo Vidal‐Ribas, Ellen Leibenluft

Bibliographic record

VenueJAACAP Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health via Writing
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioPerelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaStony Brook UniversityNational Taiwan UniversityCentre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisUniversité de LausanneUniversità di BolognaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulDeakin UniversityUniversität HeidelbergUniversité de BordeauxNational Taiwan University HospitalCardiff UniversityPurdue UniversityUniversity of SouthamptonCampbell Family Mental Health Research InstituteJanssen Scientific AffairsUniversidad de ChileInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleUniversità degli Studi di CagliariErasmus Universiteit RotterdamU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesMontclair State UniversityWayne State UniversityUniversity of CyprusUniversity of BernNational Institute of Mental HealthPenn State College of MedicineUniversität BaselUniversidade de Santiago de CompostelaUniversidad Complutense de MadridPennsylvania State UniversityRaymond and Beverly Sackler Institute for Biological, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Yale UniversityUniversiteit GentUniversity of PennsylvaniaYale UniversityNational Institutes of HealthOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate UniversityChildren's Hospital of PhiladelphiaManisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi
KeywordsIrritabilityIntervention (counseling)Sociocultural evolutionCulturally appropriateBase (topology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Irritability is among the top reasons for youth mental health referrals worldwide. Cultural factors may affect how irritability manifests and develops; how it is experienced by youth and responded to by their caregivers; and how it is treated. However, the influences of cultural context on irritability have received little systematic investigation. The Cross-Cultural Consortium on Irritability (C3I; https://m.yale.edu/c3i ) is an international research network created to increase the limited evidence base on cross-cultural similarities and differences in irritability. By bringing together researchers worldwide, C3I provides an innovative and collaborative approach to address unmet needs and to explore novel research questions regarding cultural variation in irritability. In addition, combining resources and data around the globe helps to produce robust, reproducible, and generalizable results using large mega-data. One important initiative involves pooling existing datasets to support manuscript collaborations. The first 3 such projects focus on cross-cultural comparisons of the following irritability-related topics: boundaries of normative behavior; association with suicidality and self-harm; and informant effects. Another ongoing effort involves conceptualization of irritability across cultures. Other efforts include promoting projects of primary data collection using qualitative and quantitative methods, harmonization across measures, and facilitating/supporting community-based participatory research and engagement. C3I is an innovative, collaborative research structure to build a robust, reproducible, and generalizable evidence base on irritability and its characteristics, including sociocultural influences. This evidence base will facilitate recognition and assessment of irritability and, ultimately, inform development of effective, culturally informed prevention and intervention to benefit the largest possible number of youth and their families. This article describes the Cross-Cultural Consortium on Irritability (C3I), an international network aimed at understanding how culture shapes the presentation, experience, response to, and treatment of irritability in youth. By exploring these cultural influences, C3I seeks to improve recognition, assessment, and development of effective, culturally sensitive prevention and intervention strategies to benefit the largest possible number of youth and their families worldwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.324
GPT teacher head0.583
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAACAP OpenSame topicMental Health via WritingFrench-language works237,207