Acral Persistent Papular Mucinosis in the United States: Case Series and Literature Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Acral persistent papular mucinosis (APPM) is a localized variant of lichen myxedematosus (LM) characterized by asymptomatic, flesh-colored papules primarily distributed on the hands and forearms. This chronic dermatosis, distinct from generalized mucinosis due to its lack of systemic involvement, remains underreported in medical literature. Objective: In this study, we present two cases of APPM to the limited pool of documented cases in the United States, highlighting its emerging recognition. Methods: This is a case series of two patients presenting with asymptomatic papular eruptions on the hands and wrists, consistent with the typical presentation of APPM. Diagnostic confirmation via biopsy revealed focal cutaneous mucinosis. Comprehensive laboratory evaluations, including serum and urine protein electrophoresis, showed no evidence of underlying gammopathy in either patient. Results: Treatment modalities for APPM are limited and often ineffective. Unlike other forms of LM, APPM features are confined to skin lesions, posing primarily as a cosmetic concern with a favorable prognosis. Accurate diagnosis of this localized LM is crucial to differentiate it from the more severe, generalized form, scleromyxedema, which can have organ involvement and may become fatal. Notably, while spontaneous resolution is reported in LM, including discrete papular mucinosis, APPM typically persists without resolution even after extended follow-up. Conclusions: These cases underscore the importance of recognizing APPM and advocating for broader awareness and exploration of its clinical variability, etiology, and management strategies. With increasing recognition, the understanding of APPM can be enhanced, paving the way for optimized management and improved outcomes for affected individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".