The changing transit shape of TOI-3884 b
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TOI-3884 b is a sub-Saturn transiting a fully convective M dwarf. Observations indicate that the transit shape is chromatic and asymmetric as a result of persistent starspot crossings. This, along with the lack of high-amplitude photometric variability of the host star, indicates that the rotational axis of the star is tilted along our line of sight and the planet-occulted starspot is located close to the stellar pole. We acquired photometric transits over a period of three years with the Swiss 1.2-metre Euler telescope to track changes in the starspot configuration and detect any signs of decay or growth. The shape of the transit changes over time, and so far no two observations match perfectly. We conclude that the observed variability is likely not caused by changes in the temperature and size of the spot, but due to a slight misalignment (5.64 ± 0.64°) between the spot centre and the stellar pole, i.e. a small spin-spot angle (Θ). In addition, we were able to obtain precise measurements of the sky-projected spin-orbit angle (λ) of 37.3 ± 1.5°, and the true spin-orbit angle (ψ) of 54.3 ± 1.4°. The precise alignment measurements along with future atmospheric characterisation with the James Webb Space Telescope will be vital for understanding the formation and evolution of close-in, massive planets around fully convective stars.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".