Sex-related Differences In H-reflex Responses, Co-activation, And Physical Activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Males and females display distinct differences in spinal synaptic transmission when assessed using the Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex). However, the origin of these differences in H-reflex excitability and inhibition remains ambiguous. Mechanisms thought to influence the spinal synaptic response pathway include antagonistic co-activation and daily physical activity levels. PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between H-reflex excitability and inhibition and each of physical activity and co-activation in males and females. METHODS: Thirty healthy young individuals, 15 M (24 ± 2 yrs) and 15F (23 ± 3 yrs) participated in the study. The H-reflex recruitment curves were generated for the soleus by stimulating the tibial nerve, beginning at a low-intensity voltage, and increasing incrementally past the H-max until the maximal amplitude of the M-wave (M-max) was reached, while participants contracted to 10% of maximal force. Excitability was quantified as the H-max/M-max ratio. Reciprocal inhibition (RI) was assessed by stimulating the deep peroneal nerve prior to the tibial nerve and measuring the relative decline in the amplitude of the stimulus-reflex. Co-activation was assessed via surface electromyography from the tibialis anterior and soleus. Physical activity was measured in 4 domains over 7 days with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Primary outcome variables were compared between sexes. Relationships between H-reflex excitability and inhibition and each of physical activity and co-activation were assessed with regression analyses. RESULTS: Excitability was not significantly different between sexes, but males exhibited significantly greater RI than females (p = 0.018, d = 0.93; 14 M:15F). Males had higher IPAQ scores than females (p = 0.036, d = 0.94; 12 M:12F). No significant differences were identified in co-activation between sexes (p = 0.82, g = 0.12; 5 M:10F). There were no significant relationships between excitability and inhibition in either physical activity or co-activation for males (R2 = 0.27, p = 0.36) or for females (R2 = 0.04, p = 0.74). CONCLUSION: Males had greater RI than females. However, these results suggest spinal excitability and inhibition are not associated with physical activity level or co-activation in either males or females. Supported by: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) (RGPIN-2019-05127)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".