CRISP-NET: Integration of the CRISP-DM Model with Network Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To carry out data analysis, it is necessary to implement a model that guides the process in an orderly and sequential manner, with the aim of maintaining control over software development and its documentation. One of the most widely used tools in the field of data analysis is the Cross-Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM), which serves as a reference framework for data mining, allowing the identification of patterns and, based on them, supporting informed decision-making. Another tool used for pattern identification and the study of relationships within systems is network analysis (NA), which makes it possible to explore how different components are interconnected. The integration of these tools can be justified and developed under the principles of Situational Method Engineering (SME), which allows for the adaptation and customization of existing methods according to the specific needs of a problem or context. Through SME, it is possible to determine which components of CRISP-DM need to be adjusted to efficiently incorporate NA, ensuring that this integration aligns with the project’s objectives in a structured and effective manner. The proposed methodological process was applied in a real working group, which allowed its functionality to be validated, each phase to be documented, and concrete outputs to be generated, demonstrating its usefulness for the development of analytical projects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".