MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414242570 · doi:10.1177/23477989251374723

Illusion and Reality in Ethel Mannin’s Portrayal of Abd al-Karim Qasim of Iraq in <i>The Midnight Street</i>

2025· article· en· W4414242570 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed Al‐Rawi

Bibliographic record

VenueContemporary Review of the Middle East · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTragedy (event)Character (mathematics)AdmirationTheme (computing)CharismaIllusionMidnight

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The prolific British traveler and novelist of Irish descent, Ethel Mannin (1900–1984), was very involved and interested in the Arab region, mostly due to her anti-imperialist, anti-fascist attitude, and activism. A couple of her novels dealt with the Palestinian tragedy of Nakba, as Mannin was invested in documenting the crimes committed against Palestinians when Israel was created in 1948. However, one of her novels, entitled Midnight Street (1969), garnered less attention from critics. In this novel, she portrays the life and death of the former Iraqi leader, Abd al-Karim Qasim. When Mannin met the Iraqi leader in 1962, she became fascinated by his charismatic character. In this novel, she aims at offering a realistic representation of him by showing his flaws and virtues, as well as his weaknesses and strengths. The overarching theme that is tied to the main character is illusion and reality, in which Qasim is shown as self-delusional in terms of his revolutionary goals and ideals without considering the reality on the ground. I argue that in this novel Mannin mixes some fictional details, realistic events, and even some unfounded rumors. She is also represented by the character of Julia Nikolaidis, both of whom express love, respect, and admiration for Qasim, but are also able to understand the different and often contradictory aspects of the Iraqi leader’s character.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContemporary Review of the Middle EastSame topicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207