MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect Of Passive Cold Exposure Prior To A Cold Air Exercise Challenge On Post Exercise Respiratory Function And Symptoms

2025· article· en· W4414242663 on OpenAlexaff
Michael D. Kennedy, Mirjam Limmer, Christopher A. Wichert, Aidan K. Comeau, Martin Faulhaber

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicExercise and Physiological Responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBronchoconstrictionVital capacityRespiratory systemAirwaySpirometryVentilation (architecture)Pulmonary function testingExercise-induced asthmaAsthma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cold air exercise challenges (CAX) are one approach to assessing exercise induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). However it is unclear if passive exposure to cold air prior to a CAX alters the EIB response. PURPOSE: Thus, we aimed to determine the effect of passive cold air exposure, on airway function post CAX and associated respiratory symptoms. We hypothesized that cold discomfort (CD) and thermal state (TS) would increase with greater passive cold exposure, heightening airway reactivity and reducing airway function post exercise challenge. METHODS: Fourteen (8 female) healthy participants (24.7 ± 5.6 years; V̇O2max 54.6 ± 5.5 ml/kg/min) completed 3 randomized trials (0 (CON), 6 (6Min) or 12 (12Min) minutes between warmup & CAX) all with the same 15 min warm-up and subsequent 8 min run trial at -15.0 °C. Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory flow at 25-75% (FEF25-75), and forced expiratory flow at 50% (FEF50) were measured pre and at 3,6,10,15, & 20 min post-exercise. CD (0 to 10) and TS (-5 to +5) were measured at end of warm-up, end of interim period to confirm degree of cold stress. Respiratory symptoms were tracked 24 hours post-trial. RESULTS: CAX led to 6 EIB+ tests in 5 different participants (1 in CON, 2 in 6Min, 1 in 12Min, 1 in 6Min & 12Min) and 11 in CON, 9 in 6Min and, 9 in 12Min had FEV1 reductions of 0 to 10%. Overall (n = 14) FEV1 was reduced 4.0, 3.9, 5.4 % (p = 0.55), FVC reduced 6.5, 3.0, 4.3 % (p = 0.09), PEF reduced 5.7, 6.0, 10.3 % (p = 0.019), FEF25-75 reduced 5.6, 8.7, 11.3 % (p = 0.09) and FEF50 reduced 7.3, 9.2, 15.0 % (p = 0.07) in CON, 6Min, 12Min respectively. CD, TS and respiratory symptoms were 2.4, 4.6, 5.8 (p < 0.00); -0.7, -2.6, -3.2 (p < 0.00) and 1.5, 2.0 and 2.3 (p = 0.42) average symptoms reported for CON, 6Min and 12Min respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite significant increases in CD and TS in 6Min & 12Min conditions, prolonged passive cold exposure did not augment responses to a CAX. The PEF, FEF25-75 and FEF50 reductions in the 12Min condition may indicate that mid & small airway function are affected more with greater passive cold stress, maybe linked to CD and TS induced shivering. The trend toward more severe responses with prolonged exposure highlights how “waiting to exercise or compete” in cold weather affects respiratory function and symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicExercise and Physiological ResponsesFrench-language works237,207