The Burden of Congenital Hypothyroidism Without Newborn Screening: Clinical and Cognitive Findings from a Multicenter Study in Algeria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The absence of biochemical newborn screening (NBS) delays the diagnosis and treatment of congenital hypothyroidism (CH), resulting in irreversible neurodevelopmental damage. To determine the age at diagnosis for CH among Algerian children and to describe its clinical and biological characteristics, etiology, and outcome, we conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study involving 288 children with CH across 20 pediatric centers between 2005 and 2023. The median age at diagnosis was 1.6 months, and only 28% of patients started treatment before 30 days. Prolonged neonatal jaundice was the most frequently presented symptom (58%), severe CH (fT4 < 5 pmol/L) was observed in 35% and 52% received an insufficient initial dose of L-T4. The median IQ of the 47 patients tested was 86; 11% had an IQ < 70, and a negative correlation was found between age at diagnosis and IQ (r = −0.48, p = 0.001). In children reassessed at age 3, 51% had normal thyroid function, indicating transient CH. Delayed diagnosis and suboptimal treatment of CH remain major challenges in Algeria, leading to substantial neurodevelopmental deficits. Pediatricians must remain cognizant of early clinical signs of CH to allow for timely diagnosis and intervention. Biochemical NBS for CH in Algeria is needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".