MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414253330 · doi:10.1002/mrm.70073

Combined angiography and perfusion using radial imaging and arterial spin labeling with structural contrast

2025· article· en· W4414253330 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas W. Okell, Joseph G. Woods, Mark Chiew

Bibliographic record

VenueMagnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersRoyal SocietyWellcome Trust
KeywordsArterial spin labelingContrast (vision)PerfusionAngiographyPerfusion scanningBlood flowSite-directed spin labeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose To develop a non‐contrast MRI method for the simultaneous acquisition of time‐resolved 3D angiographic, perfusion, and multi‐contrast T 1 ‐weighted structural brain images in a single 6 min acquisition. Methods The proposed combined angiography and perfusion using radial imaging and arterial spin labeling with structural contrast (CAPRIA+S) pulse sequence uses pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling to label inflowing blood, an inversion pulse to provide background suppression and T 1 ‐weighted contrast, and a continuous 3D golden ratio spoiled gradient echo readout. Label‐control subtraction isolates the blood signal which can be flexibly reconstructed at high/low spatiotemporal resolution for angiography/perfusion imaging. The mean signal retains the static tissue, allowing T 1 ‐weighted structural images to be reconstructed at different effective TIs. CAPRIA+S was compared with conventional time‐of‐flight angiography, 3D‐gradient and spin echo pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling perfusion imaging, and MPRAGE structural imaging (10 min total) in healthy volunteers. Results CAPRIA+S gave improved distal vessel visibility and fewer artifacts than time‐of‐flight angiography, while also providing dynamic information, with blood transit time and dispersion maps. CAPRIA+S perfusion images were comparable to 3D‐gradient and spin echo data but without through‐slice blurring or artifacts in inferior brain regions. Comparable quantitative cerebral blood flow maps were produced, with CAPRIA+S being significantly more repeatable. Structural CAPRIA+S images were comparable to MPRAGE but also yielded a range of T 1 ‐weighted contrasts and allowed quantitative T 1 maps to be estimated. Conclusion CAPRIA+S is an efficient single acquisition to provide intrinsically co‐registered quantitative information about brain blood flow and structure that has considerable advantages over conventional methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagnetic Resonance in MedicineSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207