CCDC103-mediated assembly of the R2C complex links RUVBL1-RUVBL2 to Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a genetic disorder caused by defective cilia motility, powered by axonemal dynein motors. Assembly of these motors is facilitated by the molecular chaperone HSP90, its co-chaperone RUVBL1-RUVBL2 and adaptor proteins such as CCDC103 (aka DNAAF19). Mutations in CCDC103 identified in PCD patients impair dynein assembly, contributing to the disease pathology. Here, we present the cryo-electron microscopy structure of the human RUVBL1-RUVBL2-CCDC103 complex at 3.2Å resolution, a chaperone assembly we refer to as R2C. It comprises a hetero-hexameric RUVBL1-RUVBL2 ring bound to three CCDC103 molecules via their RUVBL2-binding domains (RBDs), which have additional functions. Unlike RPAP3 of R2TP, a previously defined co-chaperone of HSP90, CCDC103 lacks a PIH1D1-binding motif and TPR domains, but its flexible N-terminal region regulates RUVBL1-RUVBL2 oligomerisation. Our characterisation of the R2C complex presented here enhances understanding of the intricate protein network involved in Hsp90-mediated assembly of dynein motors and how adaptor mutations contribute to PCD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".