MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Association Between Ground Reaction Forces And Bone Mineral Density In Male And Female Distance Runners

2025· article· en· W4414264816 on OpenAlexaffabout
Derek N. Pamukoff

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBody Composition Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGround reaction forceBone mineralFemurBone remodelingDual-energy X-ray absorptiometryBone densityStress fracturesBiomechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bone is connective tissue that adapts to mechanical stress from weight-bearing activities like running. Running contributes to microdamage and stimulates bone development. Low bone mineral density (BMD) may occur if the rate of remodeling is outpaced by repetitive microdamages. Bone stress injuries are common among runners, especially females, which may be linked to low BMD. Current research is limited and conflicting as to whether an association exists between the ground reaction force (GRF) during running and BMD. PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between GRF and leg BMD in male and female runners. METHODS: 28 (18 male; mean age of 26 years +/- 4.2 years; mean weekly running distance of 48.09 km +/- 28.03 km) runners underwent a dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan to calculate BMD in the spine, pelvis, and dominant leg, femur, and shank. The participants ran for 10 minutes at both a self-selected (SS) and a standardized pace (SP) of 3.33 m/s in a random order on a force instrumented treadmill to measure peak vertical GRF, peak loading rate, and vertical impulse. DXA images were manually segmented to isolate the femur and the shank individually. GRFs were normalized to body weight. Pearson correlation examined the association between GRF and BMD characteristics separately by sex, and independent samples t-tests compared outcomes between males and females (α = 0.05). RESULTS: A higher vertical impulse was associated with higher tibial BMD in males at both SS (r = 0.467, p = 0.05) and SP (r = 0.466, p = 0.5). There were no significant associations between GRFs and BMD at other sites in males (r = -0.185 - 0.425, all p > 0.05) or at any sites in females (r = -0.512 - 0.209, all p > 0.05). No body weight-normalized GRFs were different between males and females in any metric (p = 0.149 - 0.691). All BMD metrics were lower in females (mean of all sites = 1.163 g/cm2 +/- 0.15 g/cm2) compared with males (mean of all sites = 1.33 g/cm2 +/- 0.16 g/cm2) (p = <0.001 - 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the relationship between GRFs and BMD may depend on sex. Higher vertical impulse during running may be important for tibial BMD in male runners. However, female runners may benefit from alternative or supplemental training to improve leg BMD, despite having similar normalized vertical impulses compared to males during running. Supported by: Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2022-04804, PI: DN Pamukoff), the Canadian Foundation for Innovation John R. Evans Leader Fund (Project ID: 42110), the Ontario Graduate Scholarship 2023-2024 (Smith), and the NSERC-Canada Graduate Scholarship (Smith)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.515

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicBody Composition Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207