MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414267265 · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127748

Safety and immunogenicity of COVAC-2, a Sepivac SWE™ adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine in healthy adults; a randomized controlled first-in-human dose-escalation trial

2025· article· en· W4414267265 on OpenAlexafffund
Glenn Hamonic, Élodie Pastural, Supriya Arora, J. Lew, Yun Cai, Erin Scruten, Rachelle Buchanan, May ElSherif, Lingyun Ye, Thomas Courant, Roland Ventura, Nicolas Collin, Matthieu Daugan, Luc Gagnon, Paul E. Hodgson, Sylvia van Drunen Little-van den Hurk, Darryl Falzarano, Scott A. Halperin, Joanne M. Langley, Volker Gerdts, Trina Racine

Bibliographic record

VenueVaccine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)Nova Scotia Health AuthorityDalhousie UniversityUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersGovernment of SaskatchewanCanada Foundation for InnovationWestern Economic Diversification CanadaCoalition for Epidemic Preparedness InnovationsInnovation SaskatchewanMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsImmunogenicityAntibodyRecombinant DNAAntibody responseNeutralizing antibodyRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: This first-in-human dose-escalating, randomized, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded study assessed the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant protein vaccine (COVAC-2) composed of the S1 subunit of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 formulated with the oil-in-water adjuvant Sepivac SWE™. METHODS: Healthy adults (n = 61) with no known prior exposure to SARS-CoV-2 virus or vaccines were enrolled into one of two cohorts, based on age, 18-54 years old (n = 34, Cohort 1) or 55+ years (n = 27, Cohort 2). Participants in both cohorts were randomized to a two-dose schedule of 25 μg, 50 μg, or 100 μg (cohort 1 only) of COVAC-2 vaccine, or placebo on Days 0 and 28. Safety and immunogenicity data were collected from study Day 0 to 365. RESULTS: The most common adverse events were injection site pain, generalized muscle aches, and headaches in all dose levels and age groups. Most events were grade 1 and 2 in severity but one participant in the 100 μg dose group reported grade 3 adverse events. S1 subunit-specific humoral binding and neutralizing antibody titres peaked with a geometric mean of 817 IU/mL and 168 IU/mL, respectively, in groups vaccinated with COVAC-2 between study Day 42 and 56 and then decreased in the absence of authorized vaccine administration or infection with SARS-CoV-2. Seroconversion in both 18-54 and 55+ cohorts required two doses of vaccine with 100 % of participants seroconverting by Day 42 in the 18-54 cohort and 88 % of participants by Day 42 in the 55+ cohort. No clear T cell response was detected when measuring IFNγ or IL-5 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells following stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 peptides. CONCLUSIONS: This Phase 1 trial indicated that COVAC-2 is safe and induces high levels of both antigen-specific binding and neutralizing antibodies by Day 42-56 with levels beginning to wane by Day 120.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVaccineSame topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchFrench-language works237,207