Optimizing Network Performance and Resource Allocation in HAPS-UAV Integrated Sensing and Communication Systems for 6G
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes an innovative approach by leveraging uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) as base stations (BSs) and a high-altitude platform station (HAPS) as the central processing unit (CPU) in an integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) system for 6G networks. We explore the challenges, applications, and advantages of ISAC systems in next-generation networks, highlighting the significance of optimizing position and power control. Our approach integrates HAPS and UAVs to enhance wireless coverage, particularly in remote areas. UAVs function as dual-purpose access points (APs), using their maneuverability and line-of-sight (LoS) aerial-to-ground (A2G) links to transmit combined communication and sensing signals. The scheme operates in two time slots: in the first slot, UAVs transmit dedicated signals to communication users (CUs) and potential targets. UAVs detect targets in specific ground locations and, after signal transmission, receive reflected signals from targets. In the second slot, UAVs relay these signals to HAPS, which performs beamforming to align signals for each CU from various UAVs. UAVs decode information from HAPS and adjust transmissions to maximize the efficiency of the beam pattern toward the desired targets. We formulate a multi-objective optimization problem with the goal of maximizing both the minimum signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) for CUs and the echo signal power from the targets. This is achieved by finding the optimal power allocation for CUs in each UAV, subject to constraints on the maximum total power in each UAV and the transmitted beam pattern gain. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach in enhancing network performance, resource allocation, fairness, and system optimization. By utilizing HAPS as the CPU, computational tasks are offloaded from UAVs, which conserves energy and further improves overall network performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".