MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414277385 · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0005133

Understanding age at menarche: Environmental and demographic influences over a quarter century in India

2025· article· en· W4414277385 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
MD Nahid Hassan Nishan, Anika Ferdous, Mashrur Ahmed, Khadiza Akter

Bibliographic record

VenuePLOS Global Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenstrual Health and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMenarcheQuarter (Canadian coin)Public healthClimate changePsychological interventionPopulation healthPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the factors influencing the age of menarche in various Indian states over a quarter century from 1992 to 2019, with the aim of understanding how climate change and demographic factors have shaped menarche timing. Data from the Indian Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) for 1992-93 and 2019-21, along with climate data from NASA's POWER project, were analyzed using a cross-sectional study design, including 23,083 respondents from 1992 and 45,329 from 2019. Across most states, a slight decrease in age at menarche was observed, with the exception of Maharashtra, which showed an increase. Higher specific humidity was associated with earlier onset of menarche, whereas higher temperatures correlated with delayed onset. Improvements in educational attainment, particularly higher education levels, were strongly linked to earlier menarche, indicating that demographic changes had a significant influence. The findings highlight the need for public health interventions that improve nutrition, healthcare access, and educational programs to promote health awareness. Ongoing monitoring of climatic impacts on health is essential for understanding and mitigating the effects of environmental changes on menarche timing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.621

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLOS Global Public HealthSame topicMenstrual Health and DisordersFrench-language works237,207