MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414279054 · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2025.123051

Basalt melts under pressure: Is there really a viscosity minimum?

2025· article· en· W4414279054 on OpenAlexafffund
James K. Russell, Kai‐Uwe Hess, Ana Anzulović, Donald B. Dingwell

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Geology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Dynamics and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersEuropean Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEngineering Research Centers
KeywordsBasaltViscosityOlivineMantle (geology)VolcanoHigh pressureSilicateMagma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Basalts are the most numerous and voluminous magmas on Earth, the moon and many other terrestrial planets and moons. Melt viscosity plays a major role in modulating the rates and efficacy of many magmatic and volcanic processes (e.g., melt extraction, ascent rates, eruption styles). The pressure dependence of melt viscosity is particularly relevant to basalts because of the wide range of pressures they experience during ascent from their mantle sources to Earth's surface. Here, we review and critically analyse the published high pressure experimental data for the viscosity of basaltic melts. Our compilation of high-pressure measurements of basalt viscosity is relatively sparse comprising a total of 56 experiments. The experiments span a temperature range of 1275 to 2000 °C, pressures from 0.5 to 7 GPa, and anhydrous melt compositions ranging from MORB, to Hawaiian tholeiite, to alkali olivine basalt (AOB). We focussed our analysis on nineteen modern falling sphere experiments on MORB ( Sakamaki et al., 2013 ) and AOB ( Bonechi et al., 2022 ) melts that were imaged with real-time, x-ray radiography. Our analysis of these data suggests a monotonic positive pressure dependence for basaltic melt viscosity. On that basis, we present a predictive model for the Newtonian viscosity of AOB melts as a function of temperature (T), pressure (P): log η = − 4.55 + 7845.4 + 295.4 P GPa − 0.001 T K A similar model applied to the MORB dataset is consistent with a significantly lower (i.e. 13.3 vs. 295.4) positive pressure coefficient implying a less pressure-dependent viscosity. Our observations call into question the concept of a minimum in the pressure dependence of basaltic melt viscosity which has been argued to inhibit the ascent of basaltic magmas. • High-pressure experimental data ( N = 56) on basaltic melt viscosity are compiled. • Modern experiments ( N = 19) show basalt viscosity to have positive P-dependence. • Alkaline basalts have a stronger positive P-dependence than MORB. • Critical analysis of extant data suggests no P-driven minimum to basalt viscosity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical GeologySame topicMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207