An implantable system to restore hemodynamic stability after spinal cord injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A spinal cord injury (SCI) causes immediate and sustained hemodynamic instability that threatens neurological recovery and impacts quality of life. Here we establish the clinical burden of chronic hypotensive complications due to SCI in 1,479 participants and expose the ineffective treatment of these complications with conservative measures. To address this clinical burden, we developed a purpose-built implantable system based on biomimetic epidural electrical stimulation (EES) of the spinal cord that immediately triggered robust pressor responses. The system durably reduced the severity of hypotensive complications in people with SCI, removed the necessity for conservative treatments, improved quality of life and enabled superior engagement in activities of daily living. Central to the development of this therapy was the head-to-head demonstration in the same participants that EES must target the last three thoracic segments, and not the lumbosacral segments, to achieve the safe and effective regulation of blood pressure in people with SCI. These findings in 14 participants establish the path to designing a pivotal device trial that will evaluate the safety and efficacy of EES to treat the underappreciated, treatment-resistant hypotensive complications due to SCI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".