MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414282168 · doi:10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100726

Factors associated with youth vaccine acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic: Coordinated analyses across 5 Canadian datasets

2025· article· en· W4414282168 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Megan E. Ames, C.A. Sierra Hernandez, Alvin Chung, Heba Elgharbawy, Tracie O. Afifi, Stewart Craig, Carly A. McMorris, Hasina Samji, Kent Schwartz, S. Evelyn Stewart, Barbara J. Turner, Trevor Paterson

Bibliographic record

VenueVaccine X · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of ManitobaSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of Guelph
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMichael Smith Health Research BCLotte and John Hecht Memorial Foundation
KeywordsVaccinationLogistic regressionOddsAnxietyMental healthPandemicOdds ratio

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vaccines are essential for preventing infectious diseases, yet vaccine hesitancy—particularly among youth—remains a growing concern. This study investigated factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among Canadian youth (aged 12–29 years) across three pandemic stages using data from five rapid-response surveys. Multivariable logistic regression analyses identified sociodemographic, pandemic-related impacts, and mental health factors associated with vaccine acceptance. Results showed increasing vaccine acceptance over time across samples (i.e., Stage 1: 52.3 %–65.4 %; Stage 2: 73.8 %–83.2 %; and, Stage 3: 85.3 %–96.0 %). Although findings varied across samples, overall, parental education (significant adjusted odds ratios [aOR] range across samples and Stages = 0.16 to 2.07), living area (i.e., rural/urban; aORs range = 2.07 to 2.18), and COVID-19 stress (aOR range = 1.06 to 2.34) emerged as consistent factors across time. Other factors, such as being older (Stage 1 aOR = 1.15 to 3.21; Stage 3 aOR = 0.58), White (Stage 1 aOR = 1.55 to 1.69; Stage 2 aOR = 1.48), female (Stage 1 a OR = 0.60 to 0.72) or having a family member diagnosed with COVID-19 (Stage 1 aOR = 1.89; Stage 2 aOR = 0.55; Stage 3 aOR = 0.52) appeared as potential context-specific factors related to vaccine acceptance. Mental health had limited influence. These findings underscore the need for targeted vaccination campaigns addressing stable and dynamic sociodemographic and stress-related factors among youth. • Vaccine acceptance ranged from 52.3 % to 96.0 % across three stages of the pandemic. • Parental education, living area, and COVID-19 stress were key factors in vaccine acceptance. • Anxiety and depressive symptoms generally did not affect vaccine acceptance. • Targeted strategies are needed for youth with lower parental education, those living in rural areas, and those experiencing COVID-19-related distress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVaccine XSame topicVaccine Coverage and HesitancyFrench-language works237,207