MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414286786 · doi:10.1167/iovs.66.12.37

Reshaping the Burden of nAMD: National, Regional, and Global Prevalence of MNV3 and Its Correlation With Life Expectancy—The RAP Study, Report 7

2025· article· en· W4414286786 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bilal Haj Najeeb, Bianca S. Gerendas, Stefan Sacu, Oliver Leingang, Gábor Deák, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth

Bibliographic record

VenueInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGenentechAstellas PharmaApellis Pharmaceuticals
KeywordsLife expectancyCorrelationMediterranean climateExpectancy theoryPositive correlationNegative correlation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: To report the global distribution of macular neovascularization type 3 (MNV3) and to redefine the associated burden of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods: A total of 4652 patients with treatment-naïve nAMD were included. MNV3 was diagnosed using multimodal imaging methods. The prevalence of MNV3 in each country, region, continent and worldwide was calculated. The correlation between the prevalence of MNV3 and life expectancy in each country was estimated. Continent prevalence data was compared using a logistic (binomial) generalized linear mixed model (GLMM). Results: Our analysis revealed 4652 nAMD eyes from 47 countries, 575 (12.4%) of which had MNV3. In North America, the highest percentage was in Canada (17.6%), followed by the USA (11.5%). In Europe, the highest prevalence (23.4%) was in Austria and the lowest (4.3%) in Russia and Croatia. The prevalence in Asia, South America, and Australia was 6.6%, 9.4%, and 13.7%. A significant positive correlation was found between the MNV3 prevalence and life expectancy in 20 European countries (r = 0.63, P < 0.003). The GLMM revealed significantly lower odds for observing MNV3 in Asia compared to Europe (P < 0.01). No significant difference was observed in any other continent pair. The prevalence in Western Europe and Mediterranean region was higher than in Eastern Europe and the non-Mediterranean region (18.6% vs. 9.6%, P < 0.001; and 17.5% vs. 12.6%, P = 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: MNV3 is more prevalent in Western and Mediterranean regions, likely because of higher life expectancy and a lower percentage of Asian ethnicity. AREDS supplements and the Mediterranean diet may not provide prophylactic benefits against the development of MNV3. The unique distribution pattern of MNV3 and its correlation with life expectancy should be considered in nAMD research to ensure adequate representation of MNV3 patients in clinical trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual ScienceSame topicRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207