A Systematic Review Evaluating the Impact of Fibre Supplementation on Gut Health and Other Clinical Outcomes in Adults with Haematological Malignancies During Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Gut health is often disrupted in adults with haematological malignancies (HMs) receiving chemotherapy and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Microbial diversity is reduced, and both infection risk and inflammation increased. The role of dietary fibre in enhancing gut health, immune regulation, reducing complications, and improving clinical outcomes for people with HMs shows promise but the extent of their role remains unclear. Objectives: This systematic review evaluated the role of dietary fibre supplementation in adults with HMs undergoing HCT on gut health, immune function, and gastrointestinal health. This included assessment of differences between fibre types. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed and EMBASE was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, independently by two reviewers. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS). Results: Of the 5023 studies after de-duplication, 63 remained after abstract and title screening, 59 studies were full-text screened, 56 studies were excluded due to language (n = 6), wrong intervention (n = 25), wrong population (n = 4), or reporting on unrelated outcomes (n = 21), and 3 studies met all inclusion criteria. Interventions included fructooligosaccharides (FOS), resistant starch (RS), and a glutamine, fibre, and oligosaccharide (GFO) prebiotic blend. Despite heterogeneity in measured outcomes, positive impacts on gut health, immune function, and gastrointestinal health were shown. Conclusions: Fibre supplementation represents a promising adjunctive strategy to improve clinical outcomes in adults with HMs undergoing HCT, by improving microbial diversity, increasing short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production, and reducing incidence of acute GVHD. Further research is needed to establish specific recommendations for fibre in the nutritional management of patients with HM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.039 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".