MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414290418 · doi:10.1002/eqe.70064

Efficacy of Double‐Tuned Mass Dampers in Reducing Higher Mode Effects in Controlled Rocking Steel Braced Frames

2025· article· en· W4414290418 on OpenAlex
Esmaeil Mohammadi Dehcheshmeh, Saber Moradi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTuned mass damperParticle swarm optimizationDamperMode (computer interface)ModalOptimal designStackingNormal modeGround motion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This study proposes the application of double‐tuned mass dampers (TMDs) to mitigate higher mode effects in controlled rocking steel braced frames (CRBFs). A double TMD system employs two separate TMDs that can be tuned to different frequencies. Archetype 12‐, 16‐, and 20‐story CRBFs are designed using the modified modal superposition (MMS) method. A sensitivity analysis of the seismic response of CRBFs equipped with a TMD is presented under far‐field (FF) and non‐pulse‐like near‐field (NF) ground motion records. Moreover, the optimal design of CRBFs with double TMDs is explored in two optimization studies using a particle swarm optimization algorithm. The study also conceptually proposes an isolated floor damping system that can address challenges associated with structural design and the space requirements of TMDs. The results show that under FF earthquakes, an optimally designed CRBF with double TMDs can reduce median story shears and moments by up to 33.7% and 24.0%, respectively. Under NF earthquakes, the reductions are up to 24.2% and 29.1%, respectively. Double TMDs reduce 84 th percentile‐to‐MMS demand ratio by nearly 35% while decreasing the weight of archetype frames by an average of 14%. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of using double TMDs in controlling higher mode effects in CRBFs. Furthermore, the study shows that incorporating optimal double TMDs effectively reduces the structural demand under severe earthquakes, thereby decreasing the weight of the rocking frames. Author's Novelty Proposed and investigated the application of double tuned mass dampers (TMDs) to mitigate higher mode effects in controlled rocking steel braced frames (CRBFs). Through sensitivity analyses and optimization studies on CRBFs with TMDs, we assessed the effectiveness of double TMDs in minimizing higher mode effects in CRBFs. Proposed a new isolated floor damping system. Proposed the incorporation of end columns in CRBFs to effectively isolate the floor diaphragm from the rocking frame. Presented a post‐optimization design procedure for CRBFs with double TMDs under severe earthquakes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.323
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it