Cellular senescence in adult pulmonary hypertension: current state and future challenges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a life-threatening disease increasingly being diagnosed in the elderly population, marked by vascular injury, excessive vasoconstriction and progressive remodelling of the pulmonary arteries (PAs). These lead to sustained elevation of PA pressure and subsequent development of right ventricular failure. Despite the beneficial effects on disease progression and quality of life, current treatments do not cure PH, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Recently, cellular senescence has gained much attention as a stress response programme with substantial and somewhat controversial implications for both functional and structural changes within the pulmonary vasculature. Herein, we provide updated insights into the complex role and duelling good and bad effects of senescent cells in the development and progression of PH and discuss the novel therapeutic avenues that this connection opens. Finally, we identify challenges and unmet needs in understanding the two-faced nature of cellular senescence in PH and leveraging senescence therapeutically.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".