MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414295243 · doi:10.1183/16000617.0030-2025

Cellular senescence in adult pulmonary hypertension: current state and future challenges

2025· review· en· W4414295243 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah‐Eve Lemay, Yukimitsu Kuwabara, Sébastien Bonnet, François Potus, Steeve Provencher, Serge Adnot, Olivier Boucherat

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Respiratory Review · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSenescenceDiseaseCellular senescenceHypoxic pulmonary vasoconstrictionPulmonary hypertensionMechanism (biology)VasoconstrictionLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a life-threatening disease increasingly being diagnosed in the elderly population, marked by vascular injury, excessive vasoconstriction and progressive remodelling of the pulmonary arteries (PAs). These lead to sustained elevation of PA pressure and subsequent development of right ventricular failure. Despite the beneficial effects on disease progression and quality of life, current treatments do not cure PH, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Recently, cellular senescence has gained much attention as a stress response programme with substantial and somewhat controversial implications for both functional and structural changes within the pulmonary vasculature. Herein, we provide updated insights into the complex role and duelling good and bad effects of senescent cells in the development and progression of PH and discuss the novel therapeutic avenues that this connection opens. Finally, we identify challenges and unmet needs in understanding the two-faced nature of cellular senescence in PH and leveraging senescence therapeutically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Respiratory ReviewSame topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207