Posttraumatic stress disorder interventions for children aged zero to six years: a scoping review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: If left untreated, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has the potential to cause life-long risks to the health and wellbeing of young, traumatized children. Although DSM-5 diagnostic criteria recognize unique PTSD manifestations in children aged zero to six years, few well-established treatments exist.Objective: This review seeks to explore and synthesize the current literature on PTSD interventions for children aged zero to six years to inform the treatment and future research on effective, age-appropriate treatments.Method: A scoping review methodology was used to undertake this review. Following the creation of a comprehensive search strategy, a literature search utilizing the databases PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO was conducted. A grey literature search was conducted in three different steps: (1) grey database search, (2) custom Google search, and (3) contacting relevant stakeholders/associations. All eligible studies were uploaded to Covidence (2024), a scoping review management service, to efficiently review and remove duplicate studies by two independent reviewers via a two-phase screening process.Results: We identified 37 original research articles that described the treatment of PTSD in children aged six years and under. Trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (TF-CBT) was the most rigorously studied type of intervention with two published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Child–parent psychotherapy (CPP), a skills-based form of dyadic psychotherapy, was established, with one published RCT and two large uncontrolled group studies. Most studies involved caregivers in the therapeutic process.Conclusions: It is recommended that methodologically rigorous studies further explore and compare treatment options in PTSD interventions for children aged zero to six years. No treatment recommendations are currently given for children aged zero to two years. TF-CBT is recommended to be the first-line therapy for children aged three to six years with PTSD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.049 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.014 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".