MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414295714 · doi:10.1021/cbmi.5c00104

Integrative Raman Spectroscopy and Multi-Omics Analysis of Lipid and Matrix Protein Heterogeneity in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

2025· article· en· W4414295714 on OpenAlexaff
Elnaz Sheikh, Khudeja Salim, Praveen Kumar Guttula, David H. Burk, Jorge A. Belgodere, William N. Beavers, Natalia M. Stephanes, Kirti Agrawal, Brooke H. Dubansky, Fabrizio Donnarumma, Matthew E. Burow, Elizabeth C. Martin, Manas Ranjan Gartia

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical & Biomedical Imaging · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsIONICS Mass Spectrometry (Canada)
FundersDivision of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport SystemsNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsBreast cancerProteomicsDocosahexaenoic acidLinoleic acidRaman spectroscopyLipidomicsFatty acidElastinArachidonic acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fatty acid accumulation and lipid alterations play crucial roles in the proliferation and progression of breast cancer cells. In this study, we investigated molecular changes in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) tumors compared with matched normal breast tissues collected from three patients. Tumor and normal samples were analyzed using Raman microspectroscopy integrated with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) to identify ω-3, ω-6, and ω-9 fatty acids and key proteins, including collagen types I, III, IV, and V; fibronectin; and laminin. Additionally, proteomics and lipidomics analyses were conducted to characterize chemical and metabolic alterations between TNBC and normal breast adipose tissues. Raman spectral analysis showed a significant increase in unsaturated lipids in TNBC tissues compared to matched control tissues. The direct classical least-squares (DCLS) approach was used to analyze Raman spectra collected from entire tissues to identify unsaturated fatty acids (including ω-3 and ω-6) and proteins from both cancerous and matched normal breast tissues obtained from the same patients. Both Raman score data from DCLS analysis and LC-MS lipid analysis demonstrated an increase in the levels of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), arachidonic acid (AA), linoleic acid (LA), ω-3, and ω-6 and the ratio of LA/α-LA in tumors derived from TNBC compared to matched control tissues. Protein score data from DCLS analysis were consistent with our proteomics results for all proteins evaluated. The levels of collagen I (COL I), collagen III (COL III), collagen IV (COL IV), and laminin (LAM) were decreased in the TNBC tumor samples, while the levels of collagen V (COL V) and fibronectin (FN) were increased in the TNBC tumor samples. Lipidomics results showed that phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and phosphatidylglycerol (PG) lipid species were upregulated in TNBC. Network and pathway analyses have shown that coordinated changes in lipid metabolism and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling are key features of TNBC. This study designed here demonstrates the accuracy of Raman microspectroscopy as a nondestructive method for spatial profiling of lipid and protein expression on tumor slides. Further, due to the heterogeneity of breast cancer tumors and the role of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in breast cancer progression, spatial mapping enables mechanisms for profiling key extracellular components that may drive breast cancer progression and intratumor heterogeneity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical & Biomedical ImagingSame topicCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207