MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414299027 · doi:10.1016/j.obmed.2025.100650

Evaluating the waist circumference and waist–to–height ratio as most reliable indicators to determine abdominal obesity among adolescents: Findings from a cross-sectional study in Kazakhstan

2025· article· en· W4414299027 on OpenAlexaff
A. Ospanova, Aiman Kerimkulova, Vijay Kumar Chattu, Ainur O. Samigatova, А М Маркабаева, Riza Nurpeissova, Meruyert O. Zhakupbekova

Bibliographic record

VenueObesity Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverweightAbdominal obesityObesityWaistUnderweightBody mass indexPublic healthChildhood obesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Childhood obesity is a significant public health issue in Kazakhstan and worldwide. The prevalence of teenager obesity has increased almost three times over the past 20 years among adolescents from 12 to 19 years old. This study aimed to evaluate the waist–to–height ratio (WHtR) as the most informative method for identifying abdominal obesity among young people of 12–13 years old. In this cross–sectional study of 1519 adolescents aged 12–13years (mean age: 12.3 ± 0.46years), data were obtained from the from all the seven secondary schools in Semey city (Kazakhstan) science during 2015–2016. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 22). The prevalence of overweight and obesity in terms of body mass index (BMI) among adolescents was 24.6 %. Excess weight is significantly higher among girls, but obesity is less pronounced in comparison with boys. According to body BMI by ethnicity overweight is more prevalent among Russian teenagers. The prevalence of abdominal obesity (WC˃90 Th percentile) was 1.2 % among boys (n = 9) and 5.3 % among girls (n = 41). According to the WHtR, the obesity among boys (n = 57) was 7.7 % and 7.5 % among girls (n = 58) respectively. The prevalence of overweight and obesity was found to be 24.6 % in adolescents. Underweight or overweight were significantly higher among girls, but obesity was less pronounced compared with boys (р˃0,001). Our study recommends to use both WC and WHtR in determining abdominal obesity among adolescents. • Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) is an effective indicator for detecting abdominal obesity in all adolescents in Kazakhstan. • The prevalence of overweight and obesity based on BMI in 12–13-year-olds was 25 %. • Girls had a higher prevalence of overweight, while boys showed more pronounced obesity. • WHtR was found to be more effective in identifying abdominal obesity cases than waist circumference alone (WC > 90th percentile). • Russian ethnicity adolescents showed a higher rate of overweight compared to other groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObesity MedicineSame topicObesity, Physical Activity, DietFrench-language works237,207