Meningeal macrophages mask incision pain sensitization in male rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Meninges surrounding the brain and spinal cord house a variety of immune cell types including macrophages that express the CD206 mannose receptor. Here, we investigated whether CD206 + macrophages in the meninges play a role in regulating nociception and pain hypersensitivity. Methods: We selectively depleted CD206 + macrophages in the meninges around the lumbar spinal cord by intrathecal administration of anti-CD206 coupled to saporin, and determined the effects of CD206 + macrophage depletion on responses in naïve rats and in those that had received a skin incision to the upper hindlimb. In addition, we used RNAseq to investigate transcriptional changes in lumbar meninges and dorsal root ganglia. Experiments were done in both male and female rats. Results: Depleting CD206 + meningeal macrophages did not alter basal responses in naïve animals of either sex. By contrast depleting these cells after skin injury induced mechanical hypersensitivity in male rats, without changes in thermal sensitivity but had no effect in females. In male rats with skin incision injury, we found that the mechanical hypersensitivity induced by depleting CD206 + meningeal macrophages was reversed by administering the NMDAR antagonist, APV. In addition, the hypersensitivity was reversed by an enhancer of KCC2 function, CLP290. Unexpectedly, skin incision caused significant transcriptional changes in the meninges, but only in male rats. Conclusions: Taken together, our results indicate that while CD206 + meningeal macrophages do not regulate basal nociception in naïve rats, after skin incision injury, these cells mask mechanical hypersensitivity in male rats only. Thus, we conclude that in a sex-dependent manner CD206 + meningeal macrophages prevent the spread of pain hypersensitivity after a minor injury. Importantly, the skin incision we used was comparable to that used in “sham” controls in numerous rodent studies of neuropathic pain. Our findings have, therefore, potentially broad implications for re-interpreting results from previous neuropathic pain research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".