MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414301659 · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107174

TransfusionNet: Framework for cervical cancer detection using deep learning with multi-level fusion

2025· article· en· W4414301659 on OpenAlex
Sourav Basak Shuvo, Mahadi Hasan Ankon, S. M. Taslim Uddin Raju, Nazmul Siddique

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI in cancer detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeep learningPattern recognition (psychology)Robustness (evolution)OverfittingPreprocessorFeature (linguistics)Concatenation (mathematics)ThresholdingHistogramImage fusion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a hybrid deep learning model, TransfusionNet, comprising VGG19, ResNet50, and ViT with fusion for early detection of cervical cancer. An improved medical image preprocessing technique combining contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE), Laplacian sharpening, bilateral filtering, and unsharp masking has been applied to enhance image quality. An early-layer feature fusion strategy was used to enhance feature diversity and improve decision-making, unlike conventional methods that fuse only at final layers. The fusion strategy combines features from VGG19, ResNet50, and ViT at multiple stages using concatenation and element-wise addition, allowing integration of detailed and high-level information across different levels. Two separate transition blocks were used to align VGG19 and ResNet50 outputs at different layers. TransfusionNet is trained and tested on the publicly available SIPaKMeD dataset, containing 4,049 images of five classes. TransfusionNet is also verified on Herlev and LCPSI datasets. The five-fold cross-validation was employed to mitigate overfitting and enhance models' robustness and generalizability. TransfusionNet demonstrates promising results for early cervical cancer detection, achieving state-of-the-art performance on the SIPaKMeD dataset. For batch size 128, TransfusionNet achieved an average accuracy of 99.40%, an F1-score of 99.36%, sensitivity of 99.25%, and Cohen's Kappa of 99.67% across the five folds. On the SIPaKMeD dataset, the proposed model outperformed the best-performing model by 3.77% among the cited models. On the Herlev and LCPSI datasets, TransfusionNet surpassed the top-performing methods by 6.50% and 1.22% in accuracy, respectively. Future work will focus on validating the model on larger and more diverse datasets. The source code is available at https://github.com/souravbasakshuvo/TransFusionNet . • Feature fusion strategy implemented via bi-fusion and aggregated feature fusion. • Improved preprocessing using bilateral filtering, CLAHE, and Laplacian sharpening. • Evaluation of CNNs, RNNs, and transformers for effective feature extraction. • Improved feature extraction strategy utilizing VGG19, ResNet50, and ViT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it