Bibliographic record
Abstract
I början av 80-talet hade Nordiska Hälso vårdshögskolan ett starkt engagemang i utvecklingen av internationell hälsopolitik efter Alma Ata konferensen. Det var början av det som skulle bli WHOs Hälsa för Alla (HFA). Strategi 1984 och något år senare Ottawa Charter (1986) som fortfarande är principdokumentet för det globala hälsofrämjande arbetet. Inom HFA blev det första stora projektet Healthy Cities där man i Europa och sedan globalt försökte arbeta med staden som ett hälsobefrämjande sammanhang. En av de personerna som ofta var med i dessa sammanhang var Ilona Kickbusch som först skulle bli Europaregionens och senare den globalt ansvariga för "health promotion". Sjäva begreppet health promotion "lektes fram" under en tid då vi märkte att det egentligen inte fanns riktiga och bra begrepp för det man ville uttrycka. Att begreppet kom till på det sättet var lite problematiskt och en av orsakerna till att teorin, vetenskapen och the evidence base växte fram först efteråt.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.119 | 0.054 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".