MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414309693 · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114885

Assessing the effectiveness of municipal climate actions: A scoring system for residential energy retrofit initiatives

2025· article· en· W4414309693 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Hossein Jadidi, Adriane MacDonald, Aryana Soliz, Ursula Eicker

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Policy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersCanada First Research Excellence FundConcordia UniversityCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsRetrofittingRenewable energyClimate changeEnergy systemClimate change mitigationEfficient energy useEnergy policy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given the sector's significant contribution to global emissions, achieving ambitious climate targets requires substantial improvements in building energy performance. Retrofitting buildings to enhance energy efficiency, decarbonize energy systems, and integrate renewable energy is essential to meeting these goals. Through their Climate Action Plans (CAPs), municipalities are uniquely positioned to lead this transformation. This paper introduces a comprehensive scoring framework to evaluate the effectiveness of CAPs in advancing energy retrofit initiatives. Building on prior research categorizing policy actions into four levers—Mandates, Price Signals, Public Investments, and Voluntary Actions—we analyze 1283 building-related actions across the CAPs of 104 Canadian municipalities. By incorporating 12 critical insights for effective energy retrofitting and linking them to municipal climate action portfolios, the framework assesses both the breadth and depth of building-related strategies. The scoring system evaluates the integration of these insights through the lens of the policy levers, highlighting strengths and gaps in municipal approaches. This analysis provides actionable guidance for policymakers to identify best practices, refine strategies, and accelerate progress toward net-zero emissions. By emphasizing residential energy retrofitting in existing building stocks, the findings contribute to advancing sustainable urban development and addressing urgent climate challenges. • Proposes a weighted scoring system tailored to residential energy retrofitting in CAPs. • Uses 12 retrofit insights mapped to four policy levers with impact-based weighting. • Analyzes 1283 building-related actions from 104 Canadian municipalities. • Identifies major regional and city-size disparities in retrofit strategies and leverage. • Recommends stronger mandates and price signals to boost CAP retrofit effectiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.679
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0140.016
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy PolicySame topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207