MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414318939 · doi:10.1515/rams-2025-0131

Innovative optimization of seashell ash-based lightweight foamed concrete: Enhancing physicomechanical properties through ANN-GA hybrid approach

2025· article· en· W4414318939 on OpenAlexaff
Bassam A. Tayeh, Yazid Chetbani, Aissa Laouissi, Maaz Osman Bashir, Yazan Issa Abu Aisheh

Bibliographic record

VenueREVIEWS ON ADVANCED MATERIALS SCIENCE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltimate tensile strengthCuring (chemistry)PorosityCompressive strengthFlexural strengthCementAbsorption of waterResponse surface methodology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study presents a novel approach to sustainable construction by utilizing three types of seashell ashes, namely, oyster shell ash (OSA), scallop shell ash (SSA), and mussel shell ash (MSA), as partial replacements for cement in lightweight foamed concrete (LFC). This novel application of aquaculture waste as an additive enhances the creation of more sustainable and resilient construction materials for urban settings. The physicomechanical properties of LFC, such as compressive strength (CS), flexural strength (FS), split tensile strength (STS), water absorption (WA), and porosity ( P ), were assessed utilizing response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN) with K -fold cross-validation. The research examines the influence of additive type (OSA, SSA, MSA), curing duration (7–28 days), and additive concentration (0–30%) on the characteristics of LFC. Analysis of variance indicated that curing time exerted the most substantial effect on CS, FS, and STS, but additive content had a more pronounced impact on WA and P . The findings indicated favorable enhancements in CS, FS, and STS with curing durations of 28 days and additive concentrations between 4 and 20%. Replacing cement with OSA, SSA, and MSA showed favorable benefits on LFC characteristics. The predictive effectiveness of the DNN-IGWO, ANN, RSM, and Support vector machine models was evaluated using several error metrics, including mean absolute deviation, mean absolute percentage error, root mean square error, and coefficient of determination ( R 2 ). The results showed that the hybrid DNN-IGWO model outperformed all other approaches, providing significantly higher accuracy across all attributes studied. Moreover, the incorporation of evolutionary algorithms utilizing DNN-IGWO models facilitated the discovery of optimal solutions for the multi-objective optimization of LFC properties. The optimization exposed intrinsic trade-offs between targets, such as CS vs WA and CS vs P , underscoring the necessity for meticulous equilibrium in the optimization process. This study constitutes a notable advancement in sustainable development goals in construction materials by improving concrete characteristics through the incorporation of seashell ash and sophisticated optimization methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueREVIEWS ON ADVANCED MATERIALS SCIENCESame topicBIM and Construction IntegrationFrench-language works237,207