MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414326918 · doi:10.7202/1119574ar

Mer sexuée, mer sexuante

2025· article· fr· W4414326918 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Colin Vanlaer

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGender relationsOrder (exchange)Dimension (graph theory)Unitary state

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article examine les relations entre pratiques de pêche et construction du genre chez les Bajo de l’île Tarupa Besar (atoll de Taka Bonerate, Sulawesi Sud, Indonésie). En analysant une part de la diversité de leurs pratiques halieutiques, l’article montre comment la mer est sexuée. De l’île au large, une polarité se dessine entre l’espace domestique intérieur, perçu comme sécurisé et associé à l’idéal féminin, et le domaine maritime, vu comme hostile et associé à un idéal masculin viril. En étudiant la dimension sexuante des pêches, c’est-à-dire la manière dont le genre y est façonné et se déploie au travers de relations à l’environnement marin, cet article souligne son ambivalence. D’une part, c’est en s’investissant plus ou moins dans ces pratiques que les Bajo se conforment ou au contraire, dépassent les normes de genre. D’autre part, en mettant en correspondance les caractéristiques des différents milieux qui composent l’atoll et les distinctions de genre, ces pratiques halieutiques participent à leur essentialisation et à celle du régime de pouvoir associé. En l’occurrence, c’est dans la pêche au large que le viril se confond avec le masculin et que se constitue une « masculinité hégémonique » (Connell 2014).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.594
Teacher spread0.429 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologie et Sociétés→Same topicSex work and related issues→French-language works237,207→